The Bush administration says the recent "Anbar Awakening" heralds a new way of winning in Iraq. The truth, with all due respect to Stephen Colbert, is more complicated. Here are six examples of the gap between truth and "truthiness."
TRUTHINESS
Anbar is evidence of the surge's success and that of Gen. David Petraeus.
THE TRUTH
Bush benefited from lucky timing. Sunni tribes fed up with al-Qaida's extremism began an anti-AQI campaign in September 2006, four months before the surge was even announced. As things improved, the White House eagerly took credit.
TRUTHINESS
The Anbar model is being replicated all over central Iraq, including Baghdad.
THE TRUTH
It's working only in places where a majority of both residents and police are Sunni. In other areas, Sunnis view the mostly Shiite police as death squads in uniform.
TRUTHINESS
Sunni tribes are now on our side.
THE TRUTH
Maybe, but there's no guarantee they won't switch back. Ninety-three percent of Iraqi Sunnis think attacks on U.S. forces are justified.
TRUTHINESS
Defeating al-Qaida is the start of pacifying Iraq.
THE TRUTH
AQI makes up no more than 5 percent of the Sunni-led insurgency. And while the group did its best to stir up sectarian violence, the conflict now has momentum of its own.
TRUTHINESS
Anbar is a model province.
THE TRUTH
Parts of Ramadi and other major cities lie in ruins; municipal services and local governments are almost nonexistent.
TRUTHINESS
Changed military tactics won the day.
THE TRUTH
In Gen. Petraeus' words, "What happened in Anbar is politics."
When good things happen, it was luck.
Who's the spin doctor here?