NEWS .

Out Now, Ask Questions Later?

Six things for the anti-war contingent to mull.

Published: Nov 28, 2007

After American troops withdraw, will the violence in Iraq escalate?

"I don't even think it is a fair question. There is no guarantee with anything in life. Anybody who says, 'Oh, if we pull out on this timeline or do it exactly this way, Iraq is suddenly going to look like Sweden' is fooling himself." — Kevin Martin, Peace Action

ADVERTISEMENT

Should the peace movement offer a contingency plan for peacekeeping?

"That's not our job. Our job is to generate political pressure to get the U.S. out of there and end this nightmare that the U.S. is responsible for. You are trying to hold us to a higher standard of accountability than anyone is holding the Bush administration to, and I'm wondering why. In my organization and the umpteen antiwar coalitions that I am in, this is in no way a priority that we think about or talk about." — Martin

"I've spoken with Iraqi women who have come here to this country and they say, 'Leave us alone, we will handle whatever goes on in our country.' They tell me all the time, 'We're used to sleeping on our roofs with guns in our hands.' It's terrible, but they really want to settle this themselves. I don't think we need to have a plan; we need to get out of there." —Elaine Brower, World Can't Wait

"It's hard to find many alternative strategies. In the days of the Vietnam antiwar movement, there were tremendous fights about different strategies. Here, there's no fight whatsoever. Nobody even thinks strategically." —Rabbi Michael Lerner, Tikkun

Under what conditions would you redeploy American troops to Iraq?

"If they literally went there to help calm the situation down, yes, it would be a good thing. But I don't see our military doing that at this point." —Brower

What will prevent Iraq's civil war from flaring into genocidal violence?

"We have to get the international community — the U.N., the Arab League — involved. The transition plans should set up different scenarios that could include an increase in violence and how the international community, not the U.S., should respond to that." —Medea Benjamin, Code Pink

"Take the United States out of the equation and other countries can then come in and actually assist. Countries that speak the language, have a similar culture, a similar religion — as opposed to an English-speaking, largely Christian nation with big boots and a heavy presence." —Michael McConnell, American Friends Service Committee

What will make the world stop genocide in Iraq when it didn't in Rwanda or Darfur?

"The Europeans, the Japanese, and the Chinese are all concerned about the flow of oil. Come on, there is a hell of a lot of difference, unfortunately, between the international community's concern about a resource-poor nation like Rwanda and a region like the Middle East." — Benjamin

Is there any contradiction between supporting U.S. military intervention to stop the Rwandan genocide and opposing U.S. military intervention to prevent ethnic cleansing in Iraq?

"There is a little bit of a conflict there, but in general, the use of force by anybody must be a last resort and there is enough of a track record of U.S. military force not to trust it in virtually any situation." —Leslie Cagan, United for Peace and Justice

"It's a totally different situation. We are looking at a case now where the American presence is a major part of the problem." — Benjamin

 

Comments

We are not in Darfur because the likes of the above would bitch about that too. To aid these poor souls would mean first a confrontation with the govenment of Sudan. ...and you know we haven't the balls for that.(a military confrontation because you don't think they will just step aside do you?) It's not like taking food to the homeless in the Subway System.
by Ron Stokes on November 29th 2007 12:10 PM

It is obvious that the US military goes where it is in its (not mine) best interest & this interest does not serve the best interests of the people on the street. Military intervention is not in the best interests of the young Americans who lose their lives or come back with PTS and become one of the homeless. Nor is it in the best interests of the Iraqi children who lose their limbs and become orphans.

marlena santoyo
Granny Peace Brigade Philadelphia
by Marlena Santoyo on November 30th 2007 3:21 PM

...seems it was in the best interest of the Slaves in the Civil War, the European Jews in WWII, the Kurds in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Guess it depends on what is in YOUR best interest at the time.
by Ron Stokes on December 1st 2007 2:47 AM



Also In This Week's News Section

Battle Lines: Exiting Iraq: Now or Never?
Miracle In Ramadi?
Family Snapshot
The Bell Curve
Philly Blunt:
Outside the Lines
by Brian Hickey

Political Notebook:
Rudy Makes the Rounds
by Mary F. Patel

Underworld:
War Crimes
by Gabriele Valentine

 
 
ADVERTISEMENT