OPINION . Loose Canon

The New Civility, An Old Bully

While the rest of Philly is ready for civil dialogue, the Honorable Ed Rendell blew into town and threw a big-baby hissy fit.

Published: Feb 5, 2008

With Michael Nutter, the mood around City Hall is markedly more pleasant, more respectful and more civil. It is a new day, and for now the sun is indeed shining — even with the prospect of dark clouds from Harrisburg on the horizon.

But it's hard to get accustomed to City Hall's new ways. I arrived late to a press conference hosted by the mayor recently because it had actually started on time.

I had forgotten to reset my internal clock to real time. I was still on the John Street clock. As in, I am the man, this is my time, so screw you all.

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare that to the almost jaunty atmosphere surrounding Nutter. It's like someone has dusted off a fine old book on civility, and decided to actually follow the rules to which we once all agreed.

Under the old regime, a request for routine information was routinely ignored — unless silence was far more damning than the information itself. Even then, deadlines passed without a peep. So it became something of game to see how many ways you could nuance a "no comment."

Today, if I ask a fair question, I get a fair answer. No longer are fourth estaters treated like invaders. Like the citizens we represent, we are part of a process, which includes the cardinal rule of civility: Don't lie.

Which brings us to the dark clouds building on the horizon. While the rest of Philly is ready for honest civil dialogue, the Honorable Ed Rendell blew into town last week and threw a big-baby hissy fit about casinos.

The governor referred to a "City Council with no guts that can be extorted by community groups." He threatened that Harrisburg would roll over City Council if it didn't comply.

But facts is facts, Guv. Accusing council of being extorted — that's your word — by neighborhood shakedown groups is fiction and hypocrisy.

It is fiction because I know of no legitimate neighborhood group that's willing to sit down with anyone, council members or developers, to talk about payments ... er, I mean "community benefit agreements."

It is hypocrisy, because Rendell himself called groups together for a secret meeting last year at the Bellevue. He himself tried to bully them into cutting a deal with developers. But when almost all refused to talk about anything except relocating the casinos, the governor left in a huff [Loose Canon, "Secret Slot Talks," Aug. 9, 2007].

Now Rendell has the gall to state that these same groups, who refused the governor's money offers, are "extorting" City Council.

Likewise, I believe it's fiction that there's any significant support for jobs in casinos. Notice I said jobs in casinos, not jobs building casinos — for which there is vociferous support from big guys looking for construction work.

But I've never met anyone in a pro-casino crowd who says, "Hey, I want to work in a low-pay, go-nowhere job in a casino."

Still, that's the apparent claim of the governor's New Little Friend in Council, Darrell Clarke. A former Street protégé, Clarke has apparently found a new patron in Rendell for he's willing to mouth the foolishness that there's a "large majority of Fishtowners" who approve of casinos.

I don't believe it, and I've asked the councilman to back his claims with facts. Likewise, I've asked the governor to offer evidence that casinos are good for the economy. I've asked both, and both have declined.

Fellas, it's a new day in Philadelphia. Once the sun begins to disinfect our little backwater, your political sludge will really start to stink. Silly me for thinking that basic civility will outshine your bullying. But I believe that this is where it starts.

(bruce@schimmel.com)

 

Comments

Bruce: It is disheartening to find Rendell stooping to such crass tactics.I think his future in politics is over. But keep your eagle on him.
Incidentally, I miss Dwayne's raucous editorials. Did he get mugged in Baltimore? (Making an "Exit" so to speak.) Is he on book leave? (That's the chic thing to do.) Is he ill? Fired? Whatever the cause of his absence, I hope he soon reappears. Patrick
by Patrick D.Hazard on February 7th 2008 7:21 AM

Who do you think is going to work in the casinos? Casino jobs offer different levels of opportunity. Yes-the jobs would be a resource for a lot of people that are on unemployment or even public assistance. (Which by the way is supported by our tax dollars?) I would rather my tax dollars be used for education. Your comments about who wants a low paying job that goes no where is insulting to people who work their a... off to accommodate people like you. There is nothing to be embarrassed about making an honest living. Someone I guess has to do the dirty work. So why do we have hotels? Is a hotel any different? It is a shame that you are allowed to voice your opinion as if you were speaking for the majority.
by Liz on February 11th 2008 12:33 PM

Bruce: I am very disappointed with your article being an advocate of the casinos & living in Fishtown & being a member of FACT, who may I mention has been working collaboratively with SugarHouse to construct an 'Employee Benefits Agreement.' We all have our opinions of why or why not the casinos should be built, but for you to write "...work in a low-pay, go-nowhere job in a casino..." is apalling. First, I'm not sure where you come from, but there are alot of people that would be grateful for any job! Second, jobs in casinos include waitresses, card dealers, etc. Are these the "low-pay, go-nowhere job" you are referring to? If so, there are skills involved with these positions and I'm sure these people would be offended if they knew what you said about their profession. Maybe you should keep in mind that you don't live in a world full of CFOs, doctors, etc. before you write your next article.
by Helen Heenan on February 11th 2008 1:53 PM

As someone from Fishtown and more resigned than enthused that our neighborhood will be the site of Sugarhouse Casino in the near future, I must heartily disagree with both your assertion that there is not substantial community support for a casino and that it only offers second-rate jobs that cannot reasonably be desireable to anyone.
Fishtowners likely to be frequent readers of the City psaper are indeed more anti-casino than pro, but the numbers for the neighborhood as a whole tilt the other way toward construction for those with a strong opinion.
Many in the building trades will benefit form construction, but the other longer-term jobs available at Sugarhouse need not be cast aside as something one would not deign to touch. If the casino were instead a W. hotel, no one would categorize the service jobs in such as 'go-nowhere'.
Much about the siting process was flawed, but misrepresenting the sentiment of the affected are is a glaring flaw too.
by Colin Thomson on February 11th 2008 4:04 PM

I cannot believe that you do not believe there is widespread support for the SugarHouse Casino here in Fishtown. Having lived here for almost 3 decades I like many of my neighbors think that it will be the most positive developement EVER.
by Robert E. Durbin on February 11th 2008 7:22 PM

Obviously you are not too well informed if you can say It is fiction because I know of no legitimate neighborhood group that's willing to sit down with anyone, council members or developers, to talk about payments ... er, I mean "community benefit agreements."

FACT has been doing this for months. FACT is real....the members are real...... come to a meeting and find out for yourself. Members of FACT, as well as many other Philadelphians, WANT the casinos built NOW ! ! !
by E. Costick on February 12th 2008 12:20 PM

NO THANKS! The economic equivalent of building a casino is like building a gigantic Chinese-owned, blunt selling, corner store in the ghetto. It'll attract crime, lower Philadelphia's image, and lower property values. The costs are hidden and the economic benefits are exagerrated. Dumping 2,000 slot machines in the middle of Fishtown or whereever is just a bad idea, and will not create many jobs. If anything it will cost us jobs.

I feel bad for the people in Philly who have been shammed by the big casino lobbying interests into thinking this is about helping them. Harrisburg wants the money so they are forcing this down Philadelphia's throat. Rendell's been good to us, but he wants us to take one for the team. I say no, we don't owe them anything.
by Al Trombley on February 12th 2008 12:56 PM



Also In This Week's Opinion Section

Slant:
Open, Says Me
by Timothy M. Williams

Slant:
Pierced Dreams
by Nathaniel Popkin

Feedback:
Letters to the Editor
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT