OPINION . Loose Canon

A Better Bet at the Airport

Why can't Rendell sell a rich, bored, captive audience to the casinos?

Published: Jul 23, 2008

ADVERTISEMENT
Please return to your seat and fasten your safety belt. Because this should give you a bit of a jolt.

According to a survey of the nation's largest airports, Philadelphia International was recently ranked the best.

Now, stop laughing.

According to J.D. Power's eighth annual evaluation of the country's 19 biggest airports, travelers passing through Philly International ranked us as No. 1 in customer satisfaction.

Admittedly, "satisfaction" in air travel today is a somewhat relative term.

But even though Philly may be the best of a sorry lot, being the nation's leader in airport service and amenities is still an enviable perch. And valuable, too.

A happy (OK, less unhappy) crowd is already profitable to airport franchisees who feed and water them — as John Street's cronies might attest.

Likewise, a casino that caters to air travelers would also cash in — which is what Gov. Ed Rendell says he's trying to convince Foxwoods and SugarHouse.

To date, though, the casinos have shown little enthusiasm for moving from the Delaware River. They make vague noises that being near the airport doesn't fit their marketing plans.

Well, I just don't get it. Maybe Foxwoods and SugarHouse should chat up their colleague, Bob Pickus, a vice president at Trump. Pickus recently told the Inquirer that an airport location would be "just as lucrative" as a berth along the river.

Maybe even more lucrative. The 32 million passengers who went through Philly last year are not just a big market. Like the one in five passengers who are delayed nationally, they are "essentially a captive audience," as J.D. Powers puts it.

A "captive audience"? And for a casino next to an airport, just consider the marketing possibilities: "Spin to win free trips." "Take a chance on an upgrade." Or something like that.

Still, you ask, with airlines being decimated by oil prices, why would anyone want to hitch their wagon to a staggering business?

It's true that as airlines disappear, so will some airports.

But not here.

In fact, Philadelphia International should benefit from a decline. Even now, as travelers shy away from flying because of high prices, Philly's numbers continue to grow. As of April, air travel traffic here increased a percent and a half over last year.

Philly will continue to profit as fuel prices climb, and especially as airlines trim unprofitable routes. Next year, airlines are expected cut about 10 percent to 20 percent of their flights, particularly in and out of smaller airports.

Which is actually good news for regional giants like Philly, who will take up the slack. And which is why, despite the downturn, the Philadelphia airport is expanding to meet a growing demand.

Finally, from a marketing standpoint, consider the demographics of the future flying public. With rising fares, those who can travel will likely be the sort who have more money in their pockets. And, with fewer flights to chose from, more time on their hands.

A rich, bored, captive market? Next to a growing, world-class facility? Sounds like a jackpot for a casino.

"There's no question," concurs Terry Gillen, Mayor Nutter's adviser on the casinos, "that it's a plus in putting a casino close to our airport. Casinos would get a certain market they wouldn't otherwise get."

And consider how much more profitable — and more humane — for casinos to go after wealthy travelers, than to prey on River Ward and South Philly neighbors.

Rendell says he's trying to get one of the casinos to come to the airport. But, so far, he's failed.

Again, I don't get it. I can't understand why our silver-tongued governor, a former DA, can't persuade casinos to cater to airport high-fliers. It's simply a better bet for everyone.

(bruce@citypaper.net)

Comments

The only reason that the casinos aren't moving is that the Governor has not told them to. Once the Governor tells them that riverfront sites are no longer viable (and they never were viable) they will move so fast it will be a blur. Make no mistake, the Governor is the pivot man in this double play. Untill Ed Rendell stands up to casino investors, they will remain dug in (or not dug in, since the citizens don't want them in our neighborhoods
by Joel Palmer on July 26th 2008 10:53 AM

The potential move of the two casinos to alternative sites allows a possibility to correct a deep flaw in the original sites selected: duplication of logistical issues and costs. If the two casinos are located at adjoining sites, perhaps at the airport, the logistical issues, including access, traffic mitigation, policing, etc., can be addressed with a single solution and a single cost to the City. There is a true economy for the Philadelphia taxpayer in the airport/casino solution.
by Joe Schiavo on July 27th 2008 9:30 AM

When reading this column one is forced to ask themselves, "huh?"

There is a casino located right near the airport - Harrah's Chester. Why Harrah's isn't running free buses roundtrip hourly the few miles from the airport to Exit 8 on I-95 to service these 32 million passengers would be a mystery. I said "would be" except it's obvious - they are truely clueless from the top down at Harrah's Chester. One thing, for sure, this is the most mismanaged Harrah's in the entire nation. Many - not all -employees are extremely rude; racism permeates the place; and the food is average - but improved - at best. The smoke is so bad, that if one person lights up two aisles away the blowers from above push the smoke down causing a choking feeling, as it is the worst ventilated place I've ever been in. And it's not just one smoker. They are everywhere.
by Dusty Nathan on July 28th 2008 7:50 PM

I follow Bruce's logic, yet demur. Public policy, especially taxation, should be based on thoughtful analyses of economic growth and public welfare--not on the sparetime pursuits of wealthy travellers.Patrick D.Hazard,Weimar,Germany
by Patrick D.Hazard on July 28th 2008 11:18 PM



Also In This Week's Opinion Section

Editor's Letter:
When Your Name Is a Number
by Brian Howard

Slant:
Extreme Makeover: USA
by David Faris

Feedback:
Letters to the Editor
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT