NEWS .

Veganomics

Guess whose diet is most affected by high gas prices.

Published: Aug 13, 2008

Some might call it a cosmic injustice. Though many vegans are inspired in part by kindness toward the Earth and its creatures, they are now finding that their diet is very dependent on cheap gas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vegans, according to Widener University professor of economics Joseph Fuhr, have been particularly hard hit by increasing food prices, driven up by the price of gas. "They have less flexibility in terms of what to buy," he says. So when one item increases in price, it's that much harder to find a substitute.

"When you're cooking for a vegan person," says Rachel Klein, who runs Miss Rachel's Traveling Fare, a local vegan and vegetarian catering service, "you can't get everything you need from one store. ... I'm going to Whole Foods, I'm going to Trader Joe's, to Wegmans, to ShopRite. I'm going to the Vietnamese market." Gas prices on these errands add up.

Things are especially difficult for restaurants. "People are expecting a certain level of quality that we're not going to sacrifice," says Rich Landau, owner of Horizons restaurant in Bella Vista. "At a restaurant like ours, it's got to be about freshness ... We need trucks in front every day." With new fuel service costs, that can cost Landau an extra $10 to $15 per day — which he is eating, rather than passing along to his customers.

For individual vegans, it's easier to soften the blow. Buying locally is a place to start.

"Try to grow your own as much as you can, and avoid processed, packaged foods," says Allison Geiger, coordinator of the Philadelphia chapter of ClubVEG, a vegetarian education group. "That would reduce the fuel use."

For instance: Because Mount Airy's Weavers Way Co-op has its own farm only a half-mile from its store, its produce prices are nearly unaffected by the price of gas, according to newsletter editor Jon McGoran.

Landau has been buying increasing amounts of produce grown in New Jersey. But for restaurateurs, even this local produce adds up. "If it goes in the truck, you're paying for the gas," he says.



HALF OFF DEPOT
Why live life at full price?

None of this is to say vegans are disproportionately wasteful: Gas usage isn't the only factor in the environmental impact of one's food choices. According to a report released by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, the livestock sector produces more greenhouse gas emissions than all forms of transportation combined — not through fuel consumption, but through biological processes. Cows fart out huge amounts of methane, and manure produces large quantities of nitrous oxide, both of which are considerably more efficient at trapping heat than CO2.

And gas prices haven't spared meat eaters, anyhow. At Gianna's Grille, which has an extensive menu of traditional and vegan cheesesteaks, the price of meat steaks has increased slightly more than the vegan varieties, according to manager Krystle Fitch. "No one's doing well right now," admits Landau.

So what's to be done? Some might point out that, from an environmental perspective, high gas prices could be good — they could force us to burn less fuel. It may just be a cruel irony that, until a local food infrastructure is developed, going green could make veganism less affordable.

But Landau thinks we ought to be able to find a way of going green that does not simultaneously hurt the economy — he wants gas prices to come back down. And Klein beseeches vegans not to abandon their Earth-friendly ways in the meantime.

"Keep on fighting the good fight," she says. Even if it's at a price that's hard to swallow.

(editorial@citypaper.net)

Comments

I completely disagree with this article. Granted, I no longer live in Philadelphia but as a vegan, my food costs have been very stable. The biggest increase I've seen is in bread (and other wheat products), but that is more a function of idiotic ethanol production mandates.

As for the "you can't get everything you need from one store" comment, this is completely untrue. I shop almost exclusively at whole foods. Sure, if you are looking for something exotic you are going to have to go to other stores but that is irregardless of what type of diet you follow.
by Sat on August 13th 2008 9:54 PM

In fact our farm at Awbury is 1.5 acres and uses only a few gallons of gas a month for the only a few hand run machines. we have no electric at the farm and no tractors or diesel engines. For the most part work is completed by hand.

GB
by Glenn Bergman Weavers Way Co-op on August 14th 2008 3:39 PM

I was surprised that meat prices didn't take off during this recent rise in oil prices. Since far more barrels of oil go into meat production than into soy/veggie production, I figured meat would go up substantially in price. Maybe next time.
by Tuco on August 15th 2008 10:46 AM

Shame on you, Citypaper. This article is yet another example of short-minded sensationalism that so frequently applies to articles about “veganism.” It is the editorial equivalent of the question, “So, if a monkey made you a sandwich, would you eat it?” The answer: “Yes, if the sandwich were vegan and the monkey wasn’t being used for some sort of sandwich-making laboratory experiment.”

If vegans are being “disproportionately affected” by gas prices, it is because we have an much smaller impact in the first place. How about the destruction of land and the amount of grain necessary to raise livestock? The article even mentions greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide produced by these animals and the negative environmental impacts. A pure vegetarian diet is the most immediate, significant steps in attempt to go “green,” an oxymoron in this age of “consumer environmentalism.”

This article also assumes that we vegans are all driving around in gas-guzzling SUVs, traversing the urban wasteland for the scant vegetarian options known only to the most hardcore. Most vegans I know who live in this city go by bike and are far more conscious of the “carbon footprint” of both what they eat and how they get around. Not to mention that “greening” your diet by going vegan will save in fossil fuel used in meat and dairy production even more than converting from an SUV to a Prius.

I love how this article starts with the assertion that vegans are “most affected by high gas prices,” and then goes on to contradict itself with: “gas prices haven't spared meat eaters, anyhow.” How’s that for double-speak. This is clearly some well-researched, hard-hitting journalism.

The main point of this article, as with so many on “veganism” is to continue to advocate the false view that vegans are suffering. Look at the poor vegans, who pay so much for gas just to buy their meager little portions of tofu and rice! This biased article is based on the assumption that, as a vegan, I am somehow leading a “lesser” life than an omnivore, and am some kind of self-denying masochist. The truth, which this article flirts with, is that gas prices are high right now, people and industries who use cars are affected by it, and some of those people and industries are vegan. I say, not enough of them are!!!

Fists up,
Jess Davis

by Jess Davis on August 16th 2008 9:43 AM

Jess,
I appreciate your response, but disagree with your interpretation of the article.
The article is not about the merits of veganism. It is about the price of food. “Disproportionately affected” means, simply, that the price of vegan foods is being affected more than the price of non-vegan foods. Is it sensationalism to quote an economics professor about the price of food?

Nowhere does the article assume that vegans “are all driving around in gas-guzzling SUVs.” The issue of gas prices is tied most closely to restaurants, caterers and grocery stores, which, like it or not, tend to rely on deliveries from gas-powered trucks. Yes, anyone can bike or walk to the supermarket, but the supermarket does not have the option to have their deliveries biked to them. Unless you're walking/biking to a farm that uses little gas to produce its food (see commenter above), the price of gas affects the price of food whether you walk to the store or drive.

It is not a contradiction to say that one group is most affected and to then say that another group is also affected. The fact that one restaurant has experienced a rise in the price of meat greater than that of meat substitutes does not disprove that; it is an anecdote.

Finally, the article does not, as you say, assume vegans to be leading a lesser life. I believe it is quite complimentary. It starts by saying “many vegans are inspired in part by kindness toward the Earth and its creatures.” It continues to say “None of this is to say vegans are disproportionately wasteful.” It ends with Rich Landau, owner of a vegan restaurant, saying “'Keep on fighting the good fight." I realize vegans are under attack for their choices in many aspects of their lives, but I just don't see how this article is patronizing of vegans.
by brian howard on August 16th 2008 12:49 PM



Also In This Week's News Section

The Bell Curve
Of Parking Garages and Puppies
by Tom Namako

This is Not a Game
by Andrew Thompson

 
 
ADVERTISEMENT