A month ago, Ben Smith, a writer for political blog and newspaper The Politico, posted a two-sentence blurb about Philly in his online column. Smith wrote:
An Obama supporter, who canvassed for the candidate in the working-class, white Philadelphia neighborhood of Fishtown recently, sends over an account that, in various forms, I've heard a lot in recent weeks.
Illustration by Don Haring jr.
|
"What's crazy is this," he writes. "I was blown away by the outright racism, but these folks are f***ing undecided. They would call him a n----r and mention how they don't know what to do because of the economy."
Within a few days, that remark had spread across the Internet faster than a terrorist fist jab. Since primary season, race has been a central theme of this election. Reporters have probed white blue-collar and working-class Americans (and especially dyed-in-the-wool Democrats) endlessly on their feelings toward Barack Obama. But for all the polls and diner/bar interviews, relatively few whites have acknowledged race as a factor in their decision. Instead, those with concerns have cited Obama's "inexperience," saying that they don't "trust" him, or that they don't "know" him.
Those vague explanations, skeptics theorize, are covers for what boils down to simple racial prejudice. And so the less race comes up as an explicit factor, the more intimidating it seems. It's the scary ghost of November Yet to Come.
Obama supporters have in particular worried about the so-called Bradley Effect. Named after a former Los Angeles mayor, the theory (and it is controversial) suggests that when a non-white candidate is running for office, white voters will lie to pollsters and say they support or are considering the candidate, when in reality the candidate has already lost their votes because of race. White voters, the theory concludes, are ashamed to admit prejudice.
In Fishtown, however, that model seems not to hold up.
After a year of speculation as to whether voters were prejudiced, in the last few weeks — since the campaigns zeroed in on white, blue-collar communities in Pennsylvania, really — people making casual, overtly racist statements suddenly started getting quoted in the papers.
Fishtown, as the anonymous canvasser observed, was sometimes a graphic example.
What he found even more surprising, though, was that these same people were considering voting for Obama.
For the past couple of weeks, I've been talking to people in Fishtown, and I've found much the same thing. Obama's skin color is a problem for many white voters in Philly — but with the economy in ruins, they're turning to Obama anyway. Call it the Fishtown Effect.
What this means for the general election might be pretty straightforward: Obama may win even the votes of prejudiced whites. But what, exactly, it says about race in Philadelphia — or America — is a lot harder to figure out.
In many ways, Fishtown is an old factory town — it just happens to have been swallowed by a major city. Despite recent gentrification, it remains a close-knit, old-school, blue-collar neighborhood, largely Irish Catholic, and very, very white. And it's been hit hard in the last few decades.
While many whites fled cities in the middle of the 20th century, Fishtowners stayed put. Old-timers take pride in how deep their families' roots run. But sometimes old-school sentiment takes ugly turns.
"When I was a kid there was a firebombing in the neighborhood," Milano remembers. "Black workers were moving a white family in, but rumors were that blacks were moving in and the home was firebombed."
"We had a Ku Klux Klan in the neighborhood and everything," he says, adding that he feels times have changed. "None of that exists today."
It hasn't all gone away, though. A newcomer to Philadelphia myself, the first place I lived was on East Boston Street, a quiet block right on the border between Fishtown, East Kensington and Port Richmond. I had lived there only three days when I first heard someone use the word "nigger."
During the primaries, Fishtown went big-time for Hillary Clinton. According to an Obama volunteer who was canvassing the area at the time, racial overtones were sometimes obvious.
"We had this one woman come out. ... Before I could open my mouth she said she didn't vote for — I don't know if she said black people or the N-word," she recalls.
The volunteer whose observations were picked up by Politico — he agreed to speak on condition of anonymity, so let's call him Joe the Canvasser — had a similar experience during the general election.
"They dropped the N-bomb right off the bat," he says. "Some of the most graphic descriptions came out of the mouths of little old ladies. There was one lady ... dropping it almost casually — 'Oh, the nigger?'"
What really shocked Joe, though, was that even despite that kind of language, a lot of people seemed ambivalent, even open to voting for Obama.
Consider Patrick McGowan, a union carpenter whom I met at Murph's bar on Girard, just a block down from the Fishtown for Obama office. McGowan said he was voting for Obama.
"Everyone's voting for him," he said.
Would race be an obstacle?
"Not at all — not for anybody who's a working man paying taxes," he assured, adding: "First of all, he's not all black. And maybe if a black person gets in there to be president, it'll keep all the crybabies from crying discrimination."
McGowan, like many of the Fishtowners I spoke with, was ready to assess Obama on his merits as a candidate, even as he viewed blacks in general as a monolithic, possibly hostile group.
Another man, a retired blue-collar worker and lifetime Fishtowner who declined to give his name — let's call him Jim the Fishtowner — struck a similar tone, though he viewed a potential Obama administration as more problematic.
"It's not that he's black," Jim insisted. "But it's what the blacks will do if he wins, that's what bothers me. ... If Obama wins, the blacks are gonna say, 'We're taking charge, he's our president.' You know how they get."
Jim was convinced Obama would be a better president than McCain. But he couldn't let go of an almost tribal mind-set.
"When Wilson Goode burnt down half of Southwest Philadelphia, they re-elected him — because of color," he said.
Much of the national dialogue about race in this election has centered around whether people are or are not racist. But in Fishtown, at least, the question just isn't that simple. Maybe people are just voting out of calculated self-interest, but leaving old racial prejudices in place. Maybe race remains a factor, but a less important one than it used to be. Or maybe this is what racial healing looks like — gradual and tortured. Talking to Jim, one thing was clear: He was torn.
"I don't know," he said, sounding exasperated. "I just don't know what I'm going to do."
Plenty of Fishtowners, of course, will vote for Obama.
"It don't matter what color he is — it really don't," said an enthusiastic Theresa Little, on the 2400 block of Letterly.An
Still, Obama's policies are much closer to Clinton's than McCain's. It's telling that so many voters in Fishtown remain undecided.
On a cold afternoon last week, three volunteers from the Obama office on East Girard headed into the heart of Fishtown to find these voters. They were armed with clipboards listing newly registered and still-undecided voters; each registered voter they spoke to, they assigned a number — "1" for those who support Obama, "2" for those who are leaning, and "3" for undecideds.
Walking door to door, volunteer Tom Bayne is received politely. Many people say that yes, they're voting Obama, but do so quietly, sometimes even glancing down the street first.
"A lot of people say, 'I don't want my neighbors to know,'" Bayne says. "I want to tell them, 'Your neighbors said that, too!'"
In Fishtown, political correctness isn't a priority. People who have long been part of a close-knit, white community seem to worry more about being seen as traitors.
"It's kind of like a reverse Bradley Effect," Bayne says.
"Fishtown is a white community, it's always been a white community," explains Nick Herzog, who lives on the 800 block of Almond Street. Listed as an undecided in the volunteers' notes, he says he still hasn't made up his mind — but that he's probably voting for Obama.
"I figure, he can't do no more worse than Bush," he says, adding, a little sheepishly, "maybe it's about time we voted for a colored person."
As a volunteer walks away from Herzog's home, he changes the number beside the voter's name from a "3" to a "2."
He's leaning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishtown_Effect
1. BOTH voted for the Billionaire Welfare Bill (i.e. steal your money and give it to corrupt financial institutions that knowingly deceive people into scams... does that sound legal to you?)
2. BOTH support a larger, more personally-intrusive government, that will only continue the self-destructive deficit spending habit that Bush et al have formed, which literally doubled the national debt! (currently at $10,000,000,000,000... which doesn't even include outstanding and oncoming expenditures that total to more than $50,000,000,000,000 - see the documentary I.O.U.S.A.)
3. BOTH support the Patriot Act (which is a blatant misnomer, since the entire "Nazi Act" is completely unconstitutional, and therefore as UNpatriotic as you can get!)
4. BOTH support the FISA Act (which allows the Federal Mafia to further spy you... on every aspect of your life in real-time!)
5. BOTH are official members of the Council on Foreign Relations, a.k.a. CFR (a worldwide elite organization which seeks to centralize both political power and market power to craft legislation outside the checks and balances of the U.S. laws.)
6. BOTH support continued growth of the rampant military industrial complex and overgrown American imperialism around the world (even including Obama, who most people think is anti-war, when he has clearly stated with regards to Iran, "We should take no option, including military action, off the table.")
7. If you watched the last presidential debate, you should've noticed that the underlying foundation of both candidates' stances was basically the SAME.
8. NEITHER talks about the NAFTA super-highway, nor the establishment of the North American Union (a.k.a. NAU - proposed union between the U.S., Mexico, and Canada - the precursor of which is the SPP http://www.spp.gov)
9. NEITHER mentions repealing the Real I.D. Act of 2005. (precursor to a national I.D. card and database - see http://www.unrealid.com)
10. NEITHER wants a complete or swift retraction of troops from the Middle East (nor any one of the 130+ U.S. military bases around the world), which has cost the country upwards from $550,000,000,000 to date (hmm... ya think that might've had any influence in this economic downfall?)
11. NEITHER addresses the unconstitutional existence of the Federal Reserve system (a privately-owned transnational banking cartel that completely controls the U.S. economy)
12. NEITHER acknowledges the illegal, direct and unapportioned Federal Income Tax (16th Amendment was never properly ratified by the required 3/4 of the states - And if you don't believe this - do your own research, not just a Google search)
13. NEITHER supports a re-investigation into the terrorist attacks of 9/11 (which 3 of the other 4 presidential candidates DO support! - as well as Ron Paul!)
14. NEITHER supports restoration of the Constitutional Republic formerly known as the United States of America (watch online the 30-minute video called Overview of America). Instead, both of their platforms are centered around increasing the size and power of the consumerist corporation which could now be appropriately re-named the "Incorporated States of America".
15. NEITHER desires better enforcement and protection of the Bill of Rights (a.k.a. YOUR civil rights - not privileges)
16. BOTH candidates support the continued funding of the criminal terrorist state of Zionist Israel with billions of your tax dollars.
And has NO chance.
And has NO chance.
Ignorance is a dangerous thing. It doesn't matter what % of any color someone is. Vote on the issues!
ACORN hired workers who were paid based on how many registrations they turned in. Some wanted to get more money, so they made them up. ACORN knew this, but by law, they have to turn in every form. John McCain understands how the voter registration process works. He knows that had nothing to do with Barack Obama. Yet, he makes an issue of it because he knows that the average voter doesn't understand the process & it would be easly to convince people that Obama was at fault.
Same w/Ayers. People serve on committees all the time. He picked out 1 person on 1 cmte in Obama's life who he could find dirt on & tried to make Obama guilty by association. Yet, he has a much closer association to Watergate insider/20-year jailbird, Liddy, to Keating & others.
The pastors he courted: Rev. Hagee-called the Catholic Church the Great Wh*re of Revelation & Rev. Parsley-calls for extermination of all Islam (not just terrorists). There's Todd Palin & Alaska 1st secessionist party & the minister at Palin's church who said that 9/11 was God's punishment of Jews. Palin's 20-yr church teaches Alaska will be the refuge for Christians in the last days.
It is easy to twist things to look intimidating when people don't understand all the facts.
As for the race issue, everyone is a racist. We're tribal creatures by nature and sort people into 2 groups: "those like us"(or our tribe); and "others". Some people are voting for Obama because he's "black" while others are voting against him for the same reason. Both groups are voting for the wrong reasons. W;'re spposed to be sapient creatures--lets act like it for a change.
He has no experience and no real plan. He is full of a lot of rhetoric and empty promises. I have no white guilt and will happily bote Republican for the first time in a long while.
If you talking about white racists the answer is probably no because racists are racists no matter what their skin color in spite of the fact that it is politically correct to pretend that only whites can be racists.
I rest my case.
Dontcha' love liberal hipocrisy?