Republican criticisms of the Obama administration's spending practices are amusing as a form of metaphysical punishment. When people like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell rail against pork and say that the government can't create jobs, they should maybe check the employer on their paychecks. The fact that anyone takes these ideologically bankrupt scolds seriously after the last eight years is an enduring mystery of our political culture.
The bigger problem with the stimulus package and Obama's budget is that it comprehensively fails to engage with the galloping catastrophe that threatens to obliterate global prosperity. Left unengaged, it's a problem that will swallow what's left of the global economy whole, making the AIG bonuses fiasco look like a beef-and-beer gone wrong.
This problem is called "peak oil" — the point at which half of all global oil reserves have already been consumed, and the world enters a period of energy inflation, resource competition and endemic violence. Many observers believe we have already reached this point.
The Obama administration appears willing to throw gobs of money at alternative energy projects without questioning the fundamental paradigm that governs American social order. They believe we will find a new technology to enable what the critic James Howard Kunstler calls our "happy motoring utopia" — the organization of American society around highways, suburbs, strip malls and gas stations.
Preserving our way of life in this exact form is as extraordinarily unlikely as it is undesirable. No one has yet figured out a way to safely and efficiently power millions of cars and trucks with anything other than cheap petroleum. Proponents of electric cars seem not to understand that electricity has to come from somewhere, and that if you hooked up every car to the electrical grid our electric bills would blow the walls off our McMansions.
The spike in oil prices last spring did more than endanger an already-threatened economy — it led people to sell their cars, muscle onto trains and trolleys and abandon housing in the once-vaunted "exurbs." And this was with gas at $4 a gallon! Imagine the consequences at $10 or $15.
Imagining those consequences is something Obama does not appear willing to do, even as his administration spends elaborate sums making sure that every square inch of roadway in this country is maintained like the Hanging Gardens.
But someone in power needs to start asking questions about the likely effects of peak oil. What becomes of a food supply largely dependent on petroleum inputs and long-distance shipping if the price of oil triples or quadruples? How will we cope with skyrocketing oil costs if we don't start building railroads and subways? In other words, what is the shape of the reckoning to come?
The global economic depression means that this reckoning may be put off by a few years, but it is inevitable nonetheless. Obama and the Smartest Guys in the Room he has appointed to positions of economic power are trading short-term political gain for long-term pain. It's like buying a year's worth of OxyContin to treat a toothache instead of just getting the cavity filled.
The Republicans are right about one thing: There is indeed pork in Obama's budget. The Other White Meat is the continuation of America's doomed imperial policies — spending billions to maintain a ring of military bases around the Persian Gulf and continuing the failed wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and continuing to invest in an infrastructure that will be rendered useless by peak oil.
We're all slurping at that trough, and we're long overdue for a new way of life — one that doesn't revolve around cheap oil and that instead builds a sustainable, just existence for us all.
David Faris is a City Paper contributor. To respond to this piece, visit citypaper.net/opinion.
Neither the president nor Congress will know what to do with this catastrophe and they are heavily influenced by interest groups and public opinion.
Soon Peak Oil will present the nation with continuing crises that require hard decisions. It is better to base decisions on scientific study than on interest groups pressures.
Common sense tells us that there must be energy alternatives, and that is what we all want. But alternatives yield electric power, which is not what we need for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, trains, and ships and for heating oil.
Many believe that electric power can provide such transportation and power for heating. But my exhaustive analysis of scientific studies indicates that the electric economy will not work without ample supplies of oil. The nation could waste much time and investment on developing alternatives, only to find out later that they won't provide the energy required.
We are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel trucks for maintenance of bridges, cleaning culverts to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables, all from far away. With the highways out, there will be no food coming in from "outside," and without the power grid virtually nothing works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, and automated systems.
The National Academy of Sciences is the only source that can provide unbiased and authoritative answers to these questions. This is documented in a free 48 page report that can be downloaded, website posted, distributed, and emailed:
http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html
http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/
Please read my story
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/5177
with these charts
http://www.theoildrum.com/files/PeakOil1.png
http://www.theoildrum.com/files/PeakOil2.png
Where do we turn? Well it seems that you've forgotten that industrial hemp is the only perfect substitute for petroleum and petroleum by-products. It can satisfy all of the worlds, heating, energy, transportation, and textile, needs. It is much better than wood as a source for print material, and it has untold medicinal value. Moreover, repealing 1937 legislation prohibiting the cultivation of industrial hemp would save this nation hundreds of billions by eliminating costs associated with drug enforcement, wasteful ethanol production, costly safeguarding of nuclear waste, and expenditures for oil imports.
If the politicians are wringing there perfumed hands over this pending crises they only need to bite the bullet on the issue of legalizing Cannabis Sativa L. We legally import more hemp products including raw stalks than any country on earth. Canada ships it to us every day. They grow it and you don't see articles about Canadians going mad or stupid because of the cultivation and use of hemp. America's powers that be don't really want competition in this "free market society--ha ha" so they've suppressed all factual information about the benefits of hemp. A product that has been used since the dawn of man's agricultural pursuits.
WAKE UP AMERICA WE HAVE A SOLUTION TO PEAK OIL, WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE SMARTS TO USE IT.
Does Obama even know ? Well, local politicians (a few anyway) know, so why shouldn't Obama? Probably the bigger problem is the larger political apperatus not understanding the full scope of the ramifications and therefore still pushing their narrowly focussed pet causes when what is needed is a complete mobilization to a common purpose. That is where some dramatic leadership and truth-telling from the top would help - only it can't be done due to the reason mentioned. A very difficult problem, indeed.