Here is a serious question for PETA, Jennifer Utley, the small but vocal army of do-gooders outside the Novacare Complex and everyone else loudly (or quietly) protesting the Philadelphia Eagles' addition of former prison inmate Michael Vick: Why? I don't mean this sarcastically. Moving forward, what do you want from the newest Eagle?
Let's back up and look at the facts. Michael Vick funded an operation that drowned, hung and beat dogs to death for the crime of not fighting other dogs well enough. Worse, Vick was not blind to these actions. According to testimony presented at his trial, Vick (at least) witnessed all of this. None of this is under dispute, and none of it is morally defensible or legally permissible.
But the story doesn't stop there. As a result of his actions, Michael Vick was punished. He lost his job and the 10-year, $130 million contract that went with it. He lost his pride, his freedom, his presence in the formative years of his newborn daughter's life, and 18 months. Instead of living as the face of our most prominent national sport, Michael Vick lived in an 8-by-10-foot cell for nearly two years in Leavenworth, Kan.
And then, with the blessing of United States penal system, he was released.
Was he released because he paid his debt to society? No. (What does that even mean?) He was released because he lives in America, and like everyone else who has agreed to live in America, that's what happens after you serve your legally determined stay in jail. It's as much of a rule as driving on the right side of the street. In our society, dog-fighting is illegal. Rightfully so. Also in our society, once a person passes through the justice system and is deemed fit to re-enter, he has the right to earn a living at whatever profession suits his skill. Michael Vick's profession is football.
Last week I spoke with Dan Shannon, a pleasant man with the type of laid-back demeanor you probably wouldn't expect from the official spokesman of PETA, which is what Shannon is. "Look," he reasoned, "if this had happened to a regular person — if you or I had committed the offenses that Michael Vick did — I would imagine that we would have trouble finding employment." This is true, but it's totally inapplicable as a counterargument to Vick, because everything's relative. When Vick inked his previous contract, it made him the highest-paid player in NFL history. His face was on the cover of magazines and video games. Now? Vick just signed a non-guaranteed contract for roughly 88 percent less than what he had been previously making, all to be the backup to a backup (as of press time, Vick is listed third on the Eagles' QB depth chart) and see his face on protest posters. In short, it wasn't easy for Vick to find employment, considering his previous market value.
On top of all this, Vick is trying to right his wrongs. He's working side by side with the Humane Society and, PR gimmick or not, kids are hearing the message that he fucked up. It speaks volumes that both former Indianapolis head coach Tony Dungy, who is as famous for his faith as he is his Super Bowl rings, and Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie, who owns a rescued dog of his own, have put themselves on the line for a man they believe has changed.
Vick joined the Eagles not because the team's system fit his skill set (it doesn't) or because there was an obvious opportunity for playing time (there isn't), but rather because the stability of the organization was important to a man trying to piece together a once-promising career. When he was introduced as the newest member of the Eagles, he spent the entire press conference apologizing. You may doubt the sincerity of his remorse — as he freely admits, only his actions going forward can prove or disprove that — but certainly not how demoralizing the experience has to have been. Here is a man, two years ago revered as the single greatest athlete of his generation, answering question after question after question about things he'd done wrong, with only two mixed in regarding his potential impact on the field. This context can't help but humble him.
Look, our penal system may not always achieve its end goal, but its end goal is important: Here in America we don't lock up criminals as an act of vengeance, we do so in an attempt at reformation. The end goal isn't to make prisoners hurt, it's to make them not criminals, and then release them so they can go back to driving on the right side of the road. What protesters are asking for is not only overly harsh — when did PETA become harsher toward criminals than the justice system? — it's also fundamentally undemocratic.
So now, here, we're asking them publicly: What do you want out of Vick? Do you want him never to fight dogs again? Do you want him to publicly repudiatehis previous behavior and work with the Humane Society to inform kids about the problems with such behavior? Or do you want blood? You can't have both.
Now I know a fish is not your dog, but they never gave it a 2nd thought. Their whole approach to all animals but pets was barbaric. We are in a slow ascent from that - and in pockets (like most of our food industry) that ascent has not even dawned yet.
My take is that M Vick grew up in one of those pockets and then isolated himself from the kind of influences that might have straightened him out (take Ike Reese as a possible example. Older players with their values in place.)
Not to excuse it - jail time was the way to go. Some messages just have to be delivered hard.
But now M. Vick is about to return to a job that really is outside the public trust (not a teacher, not a cop) - and his "celebrity" I would expect must be kinda hard for a still-young man to deal with. He IS reviled and has to walk his way through that gauntlet.
I hope he can and I hope he does some good with his life going forward. I would feel the same if he was an Eagle or a Cowboy.
All of us:
Teach the kids to treat dogs (and all other animals) right
Teach the kids that Mike Vick is a gifted athlete and that that does NOT make him a role model
Teach the kids to face down evil and not get too self-righteous in the process
The Eagles let my sports role model go - B Dawk
Looking forward to December 27
Our local PETA and the PSPCA have thus far refused to work with Vick, leaving the Humane Society as his only partner. There is no way that the animal rights groups -- comprising largely white, affluent people -- are going to reach the (largely black, not-so-affluent) kids who are fighting dogs. Mike Vick, on the other hand, could actually help get these groups' message out in a way they have thus far been unable to.
Look, what he did was disgusting -- although I do think the moral outrage is kind of a joke, given that we flock to UFC fights (isn't that just human dogfighting?), how we treat pigs in slaughtering them, and that we can legally hunt all kinds of animals -- but his actions can't be undone at this point. So why not enlist him to help to prevent more dogfighting? Is that not the goal of PETA and the SPCA?
And as for the "well at least he shouldn't be allowed to play in the NFL" argument, there is no committee in our country that decides who gets to do what profession. If an NFL team is willing to hire him, he can play in the NFL. If no one hires him, he finds another line of work. No committee got together and decreed that Martha Stewart had to find a new living. Instead, Wal-Mart kept selling her stuff and NBC gave her a tv show. That's their right, just as it's the Eagles' right to give him a job.
You never actually say what “protesters” are asking for. So what is it? No one is saying that he doesn't deserve a 2nd chance. It's what he does with his 2nd chance that matters. I’ve been waiting to hear something about him working with an organization that helps animals. So if you claim that he is “working side by side with the Humane Society,” please do tell me where I can read that. Why do you think PETA wants more than that? I think what most of us (who are disgusted by this) want is for a person to be truly remorseful and deserving of the 2nd chance. If the guy gets to make tons of money sitting around on a bench, or even running around on a grassy field, while still being a loser off the field, why should we commend the Eagles for enabling that? We should require better of our Philadelphia teams, as these guys are often role models. So to those of you who are claiming that “the Eagles hired him. No one gets to decide what profession you get to be in when you are released from prison” – that is exactly the point. The Eagles don’t give a rat’s ass how the other players feel, nor how their fans feel. What they care about is money, so boycotting the games would hit them where it hurts. If they really cared about 2nd chances, I can think of at least two other people that should be back on their payroll. Two people without a violent history like Michael Vick.