NEWS .

Party's Over

Don't even think about having any fun near Councilman Darrell Clarke's house.

Published: Nov 11, 2009

[ noise pollution ]

STOP THE ROCK:  Darrell Clarke's legislation would keep anything like the short-lived Fishtown Collective � founded by Will Sacksteder (left) and Victor Gennaro (right) � from opening in the neighborhood again.
Neal Santos
STOP THE ROCK: Darrell Clarke's legislation would keep anything like the short-lived Fishtown Collective — founded by Will Sacksteder (left) and Victor Gennaro (right) — from opening in the neighborhood again.

In the long list of Philadelphia's turgid and ineffective agencies, the Department of Licenses & Inspections has always ranked among the most turgid and ineffective. Fair or not, it's the agency known for not doing much — and when it does, it's usually not what you wanted, or when you wanted it.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Victor Gennaro and Will Sacksteder don't know L&I for its lethargy. They know L&I for its uncharacteristic swiftness on a mid-May weekend. On May 9, Gennaro and Sacksteder, both 20, held the inaugural event of the Fishtown Collective, a midsize venue inside an empty warehouse underneath the El on Front and Jefferson streets. It was three months in the making. They say L&I gave them a written go-ahead to have the event. (They didn't keep the letter; the L&I officials who would have had knowledge of such a letter didn't return calls seeking comment.)

"We sold 500 tickets that night," says Gennaro, a junior at Temple University with Sacksteder. "We had a hell of a night."

A block away, just west of Front Street on Jefferson, is Councilman Darrell Clarke's rowhome, and surrounding that rowhome are Clarke's constituents, who Clarke says complained about the nuisance of the Fishtown Collective — beer bottles, loud music, public urination. Gennaro says one resident approached him after the event with a long litany of complaints, including: "The councilman couldn't park his car."

By Monday, May 11, L&I had posted a "cease operations" notice on the warehouse. A couple of weeks later, Gennaro and Sacksteder went to Clarke's City Hall office. When Clarke came in, they stood up to introduce themselves. "I know who you are," Gennaro says Clarke bluntly told them. Clarke, they say, told them that they were "assaulting" and "terrorizing the neighborhood."

"He looked at us," says Gennaro, "and said, 'I am going to do everything in my power to make sure you never operate in this neighborhood again.'" Clarke denies saying anything of the sort. But regardless of what he said, that's exactly what he did.

On June 18, without fanfare or media attention, City Council unanimously passed a bill called the North Central Front Street Special District Controls, which Mayor Nutter later signed. Like other Special District Controls, the law prohibits certain developments without the approval of the Zoning Board of Adjustments — a board that rarely signs off on a proposal if a councilmember, like Clarke, dissents. In effect, the law gives Clarke veto power over what happens in his backyard. (This isn't Clarke's first experience with Special District Controls. In 2005, Clarke wrote the Girard Avenue Special District Controls, which bans new supermarkets and pharmacies from a commercial corridor bereft of either. )



HALF OFF DEPOT
Why live life at full price?

Clarke introduced his bill on May 14, five days after the Fishtown Collective hosted its show. It places heavy restrictions on a strip of Front Street right around the Fishtown Collective's location, and effectively neutralizes the possibility of anything but residences ever existing within the law's jurisdiction, between Girard and Oxford avenues. (There were already restrictions on bars, restaurants and other nightlife in place for much of Fishtown and Northern Liberties; this new law tightened those restrictions.)

In a telephone interview, Clarke says there is no connection between the Fishtown Collective and the new zoning rules, "because they weren't in compliance already" — meaning that he didn't need to change the rules to have the collective shut down. But the law doesn't just prevent Fishtown Collective from obtaining the proper permits to get back and running; it prevents anything like Fishtown Collective from ever opening in the area again.

While these restrictions apply onlyto a four-block stretch of Front Street, it's a potentially critical spot for the burgeoning arts movement in Fishtown and South Kensington. The El's underbelly, in all its darkness and abundance of vacancies, has long been a hot destination for undesirables, and it's tough to lure developers to build much underneath the thunder of the Frankford line. Clarke's restrictions cover everything from auto repair shops to bath houses, takeout shops to any establishment besides the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board selling alcohol — in other words, no bars. Even vending machines are banned. Most broadly, it prohibits the "entertainment of guests and patrons as a main use."

"We had absolutely no idea this was coming through," says Micah Hanson, who chairs the zoning committee of the Fishtown Neighbors Association (FNA). "And then we were notified, not through the councilman's office, but through the [New Kensington Community Development Corp.].

"You're using an elephant gun to swat a fly," Hanson adds. "You don't install this councilmanic privilege that changes the zoning of an area just because you have one building that's a problem."

Neighbors recall the Fishtown Collective show as a nuisance. "People pissed on my fence," says Rob, who wouldn't give his last name. Pointing at the ground next to him, he says, "Down there were beer bottles all over the place."Even though there were no recorded calls to the police that night, it's easy to imagine a few people out of 500 irritating the area's residents. But if the options left for under that section of the El are whittled down to factories (which no one builds anymore), offices and residences (neither of which anyone wants underneath a screaming train), what exactly is left to go there?

"Given where the El is, right over it, that in and of itself limits legitimate uses you can have there," says the FNA's Hanson, who is also an architect. "As much as we all focus on mixed use and commercial and condos and art galleries, at the same time, there are still people that make things, whether it's music or metal work or whatever, and I think that an area like that could go a lot of ways."

Of those, metal work is now the only legal possibility.

L &I says its swift crackdown on the Fishtown Collective was not unusual. The agency's nuisance task force, which handles these types of complaints, is run out of the Philadelphia Police Department, says spokesman Dominic Verdi. It responds to complaints more quickly, particularly when they center on a time-specific event — like 500 rowdy kids in an empty warehouse under the El.

ADVERTISEMENT

Today, the Fishtown Collective is but a shell of its former self. On a Saturday in October, Gennaro and Sacksteder lead a City Paper reporter through the Collective's empty carcass, housed in a warehouse attached to the Chalmur Bag Factory, a company owned by Sacksteder's father. Chunks of the stage have been torn off and donated to artist friends for projects. Water has dripped down and soaked sections of the particle board. A banner hangs on one wall with the words "Fishtown Collective" written in urban bubble lettering.

Gennaro stands behind a makeshift box office set up in a room within the warehouse and recounts how much they spent. "The sad thing," says Sacksteder, "is we didn't even make back our initial costs."

Gennaro and Sacksteder offer indictments of bureaucratic absurdity, recount the fun of the night, and display the mostly empty warehouse with a mix of pride and defense. There's a feeling of, "You see? This is what could have been."

"Fishtown is being labeled as this up-and-coming arts community," says Gennaro, "and we just wanted to be a part of that."

Gennaro starts to speak, then stops — he has to wait until the roar of the El train passes.

(andrew.thompson@citypaper.net)

Comments

there are many offensive things about this article. those of us currently living in north philadelphia resent the continued references to some of us as 'unsavory characters' and this obscene notion that college students and an imported art scene will in some way save our area.

we have art here in north philly- its called graffiti- we live in difficult conditions, but we are people. we have local art communities and innovators (taller puertoriqueno) and we read this newspaper that would run an article with such belittling language directed at an impoverished neighborhood.

i am not entirely a fan of darryl clarke's. generally he votes for legislation directed towards gentrification, so it is puzzling that he would vote to oust this 'art community' if they were building up the property value of the community. those that live in the community and find events disruptive have the right to act against them.
by bgirl on November 12th 2009 2:17 PM

Bgirl,

Thank you for the response. I'm not sure what offense you take by my reference to drug dealers and prostitutes as "undesirables." And no one is implying that graffiti is somehow inferior to anything showcased in an indoor venue.

I also clearly state in the piece that neighbors found the event to be a nuisance. The article was not a focus on the event itself, but Councilman Clarke's reaction to it.

Andrew
by Andrew Thompson on November 12th 2009 2:58 PM

umm, I think you are a bit overly sensitive.

"Under the el" and "unsavory" are terms well-understood by those who live in Kenzo/Fishtown to mean junkies and hookers.

Clarke has long-been on a vendetta against re-development of all sorts...

It is hardly "obscene" to note that artists tend to appear in areas that will soon re-establish themselves.

This is a fact.
artists-gays-students-yuppies--gentrified.

However, gentrification takes on lots of different forms. A solid area--such as Norris Square/Fishtown has a different sort of gentrification than a more blighted area--old northern liberties because areas that actually still function as neighborhoods do not present the same opportunities for developers as the more blighted spaces.

Clarke made a draconian move here for votes. He made his own personal zoning code.

That is arbitrary and not in the best interest of anyone that would like to see more under the el in certain sections than junkies and whores.
by steveeboy on November 12th 2009 3:00 PM

Really, you want us to feel sorry for these guys? Maybe they are naive but you need permits and licenses to open up a live music venue, even if it's just for one performance for one night. You don't just get a letter from L&I that says, "Sure, kids, go ahead. Have a swell time." Maybe that's why the letter can't be found? I'd be furious if there were suddenly 500 drunk kids around the neighborhood. As for whether kids and drinking gentrifies a neighborhood, Manayunk/Roxborough is way overdue for the gentrification that results from drunk college kids. If you really believe that Clarke moved the new zoning that quickly, you have no idea of the process and time needed to change zoning codes.
by oxworthy on November 12th 2009 8:20 PM

Mr. Thompson, why are prostitutes and drug dealers, that are in many cases in very indigent circumstances and trying to maintain a family or modest dwelling, less desirable than pretentious college students breaking bottles and urinating on people's residences and are only interested in 'being part' of an up and coming art scene?

i challenge all of the readers of this- this prejudice lies in your own mind, and this mindset is exactly the kind of justification used for ages for imperialism all of the world.
by bgirl on November 13th 2009 6:41 AM

I feel you, bgirl.

'Up and coming' neighborhoods have become big playgrounds for young people with little/no disregard for the people who've lived there.

I've heard the counterargument countless times before: "it was a sh*thole before and our (being new, young people) presence improves it."

The physical space itself improves but not so much the economic and social conditions of people who've lived there before gentrification. Real estate prices rise but it isn't the old timers who are profiting from it. There are fancy bars and restaurants but it isn't the old timers who are going to shop there.

And another thing: I'm tired of yuppies and hipsters who think it's 'cool' and adventurous to live in a neighborhood in poverty. My neighborhood isn't a safari.

I wonder what would happen, as a young person of color, if I were to move to a suburban neighborhood and as a relative newcomer decide to throw huge parties in/near a large residential area? Let's say my friends are talking loudly and piss drunk throughout the street. However, they aren't violent and they are usually very polite (when they aren't drunk) and considerate. In other word, they're like the young people moving into areas like Kensington, except they're mostly people of color moving into a suburban neighborhood.

In that situation, we'd get vilified, if not arrested and profiled.
by Charles on November 13th 2009 9:37 AM

Charles,
How does that change the fact that the councilman has all but preserved the fact that the area under the El will remain a dump?

Also, your attitude on the suburbs and the neighborhoods in poverty clearly underline the attitudes that continue to form racially and economically segregated neighborhoods. Keep up the good work.
by Pete D on November 14th 2009 2:01 PM

I kind of think this guy is out of control. I agree people are people and they will do what ever they want. Not to mention names, but some of the comments are very prejudice. I tend to disagree about it being mostly "people of color." Everyone is involved white or black.
by Dionte Latty on November 15th 2009 8:46 AM

To me, the past couple of articles in this column prove to highlight something happening all over Philadelphia; local political associations in these transforming neighborhoods (with ALL the power) are unable to recognize potential in young minds and help engage them in a manner that's productive for the neighborhood. Use the talents of these motivated individuals to fill the gap of what's missing in these parts of town. Zoning boards and council office's in these 'up and coming' hoods need to work with their college students, young professionals and young families to help create a neighborhood conducive to their needs as well. I'm a graduate of Temple, moved into a changing hood, and started a business, and I often feel marginalized by the old timers. Let's embrace and stop the hate people (especially the ancient argument of race), it's 2009!!! Otherwise, we'll watch these passionate people move elsewhere, missing out on growing Philly as a collective WHOLE!
by Aliosa on November 16th 2009 4:23 PM

Darrell Clarke is an f-wit, everyone knows that... The irony is that in trying to improve conditions for his neighbors, he's essentially just condemned them to thirty more years of crime, blight and decay. Way to have a vision there, Clarkey.
by Anon on November 16th 2009 8:47 PM

Disregard my previous comment. Back to the drawing board.
by Charles on November 17th 2009 12:26 AM

It can no longer be denied that race is an issue in this city. This article plays on that issue, big bad (black) Darrel Clarke wants to get rid of these suburban goofy haired (white) youngsters who are only trying to help. - its not true- these kids are capitalists looking for an adventure in this urban 'safari'.

Charles, i think your comments are valid, all the comments expressed here are, but i still don't completely understand why people wouldn't support the residents of the community and instead support these children that moved in recently- and by their own admission- only to be a part of something cool not to create a positive environment- with financing from their suburban families. We (under the El) are not here to be saved by white suburbia, we are better than that, we are saving ourselves and think people should start writing about that.
by bgirl on November 17th 2009 6:35 AM

Maybe they aren't writing about that because the area under the El is 30-30% vacant and continuing to hemorrhage jobs and neighbors. As you criticize whatever racial bias your reading into in this article (pssst, this part of the el is in fishtown and is majority white on the east side) is nullified by your own obvious bias against "capitalists" and "white suburbia". You're basically supporting a viewpoint that people that invest money in the city from outside are unwanted or should at least be penalized for not having been born here. Great job.

I certainly hope you at least have lived here your whole life to take that position. I also wish you the best of luck in restarting those textile mills in Kensington yourself, cause that's the only way you're going to be "saving yourself" without outside investment.

clue: Kensington needs jobs and education that and it will never be able to pay for those things in house.
by RW on November 18th 2009 2:49 PM

Just for clarification - One of the organizers IS from the area. His father is a local business owner, owns the property in question and is President of the Rivers Edge Civic Association. Not a suburban kid.

It's a shame Clarke wasn't willing to work with this group to remedy the situation and find a way to co-exist. I see this as an abuse of power on his part.

by Kenzo on December 9th 2009 1:21 AM

Just for clarification - One of the organizers IS from the area. His father is a local business owner, owns the property in question and is President of the Rivers Edge Civic Association. Not a suburban kid.

It's a shame Clarke wasn't willing to work with this group to remedy the situation and find a way to co-exist. I see this as an abuse of power on his part.

by Kenzo on December 9th 2009 1:21 AM



Also In This Week's News Section

The Bell Curve
Icepack
by A.D. Amorosi

Man Overboard!:
Planet SEPTA
by Isaiah Thompson

A Million Stories
by Jeffrey C. Billman and Scott Yorko

Sports:
No, You Shut Up
by E. James Beale

 
 
ADVERTISEMENT