NEWS . Man Overboard!

Needed: Rich Dudes

It's screw or be screwed, apparently.

Published: Apr 20, 2010

Next week, Philadelphia mega-lawyer Stephen Cozen will explain to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board why it should extend Foxwoods' casino license when his team has been totally unable to find investors for their shaky project. Cozen needs rich dudes, and he needs them fast. So, what's the holdup, rich dudes? Maybe they see something the Gaming Board, the legislature and Gov. Ed Rendell do not: that gambling is not an industry, but a tax — on the small portion of people with the strange habit of coughing up irresponsible amounts of money at slot machines. And maybe they're wondering if that much-desired population can actually support yet another Philadelphia-area casino. (SugarHouse is under construction, and Parx, in Bensalem, is already open.)

The question — what's the gain? — is so obvious that you'd think city leaders would be asking it, too. But so far, they haven't. Mayor Nutter long ago made clear that he took issue with Foxwoods' waterfront location, but not its doing business here; state Sen. Larry Farnese, whose district encompasses both casinos, has called for Foxwoods' license to be revoked, but says it should be rebid in a new location.

Here's another idea: Why not revoke it altogether?

ADVERTISEMENT

A recent study commissioned by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, which offered assessments of both pro- and anti-casino studies that preceded it, concluded that it was impossible to tell whether the benefits of casinos outweigh the costs — in crime, in lost opportunity, in gambling addiction and misery — to the communities that host them. The decisive factor, it noted, was whether they drew patrons from other areas.

It's screw or be screwed, apparently. Luckily, we don't have to speculate about where our casino patrons will come from. During a 2008 presentation to the Gaming Board, Parx — protesting a proposed Valley Forge license — noted that "nearly all" of its "repeat players" lived within 25 miles of the casino, and that more than half of its patrons lived within 25 miles of the Foxwoods or SugarHouse sites. Foxwoods isn't expected to generate money, it's expected to take it: from us and our neighbors, to be divvied up between the state and some rich dudes, yet to be found.

But when even they aren't biting, why the hell are we?

Isaiah Thompson could use some rich dudes of his own. E-mail him at isaiah.thompson@citypaper.net.

Comments

Exactly. Would people drive right past the gambling halls that practically ring the city at this point, just to destroy themselves in the middle of big scary Philadelphia? No reason to. Especially not the small number of gamblers who provide most of the revenue by coming again and again. At least Steve Wynn, before he pulled out, had the honesty to say out loud what everyone knows: Casinos in Philly would prey on the surrounding neighborhoods. Revoke the license ... permanently!
by Rich Garella on April 23rd 2010 1:25 AM

I'm anti-casino, but to do an honest calculation, you need to at least consider whether Parx's 25-milers would otherwise go to AC. I don't think it makes a difference, locally targeted casinos are a cancer, but I expect more from CP.
by David G on April 28th 2010 2:57 PM



Also In This Week's News Section

The Pittsburgh Story
by Dan Hirschhorn

A Million Stories
by Jeffrey C. Billman and Holly Otterbein

The Bell Curve
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT