ARTS . Re-View

She and Her

Robin Rice on Visual Art: Women's Work at Sande Webster Gallery

Published: Apr 20, 2010

The title of the show at Sande Webster is what initially caught my interest. What does "Women's Work" as an exhibition topic mean, exactly?

Bonus Web Content
Bonus Web Content

Click Here For More Images

It turns out the show is not concept-driven. It was organized by Philadelphia artist John McDaniel, who works curatorially for Webster, and by gallery director Gregg Krantz with some input from associate director Philippe Jean, who joked that he'd contributed about 2 percent to the planning of the show. The installation in Webster's main gallery presents a lot of high-quality art by 11 mostly mid-career or senior women, but there's no perceptible message. The title is a straightforward description of what's in the show.

There may not be a group theme, but each artist has an impressive individual presence. Work by women and men is the subject of Marta Sanchez's prints (pictured). Shown with the originals on a facing wall, they recall the great generation of Mexican muralists like José Clemente Orozco and Diego Rivera. Sanchez's Workers on the Track is an almost nostalgic invocation of a past century's once powerful but now defanged revolutionary politics. In the borders of the print, Sanchez writes of the railroad workers, "They are and always will be the salt of the earth."


(CLICK IMAGE FOR LARGER VERSION)

As she studied Alice Oh's three small abstract Phases of Conception, one gallery visitor remarked, "This is what a vagina should look like." The pale, soft geometry of the mandala-like compositions (pictured p.28) suggest vaginas in the most oblique way possible. They could be telling us that hard-edged theoretical science ends where fragile biological processes begin. Barbara Bullock's sophisticated assemblages, tiny in comparison with her public art, smoothly present stark silhouettes that enclose dark interior collage elements. Hinting at African influences typical of Bullock's work, these pieces are mysterious and companionable without becoming clichés. The unframed collage of painted paper and fibers, Come on in My Kitchen Cause It's Raining Outside, almost leaps off the wall with joyous exuberance.

Sewing and needlework, long regarded as expressive disciplines suitable for ladies, were appropriated in the 20th century by Miriam Schapiro, Judy Chicago and other groundbreaking women artists (along with some male artists, like Robert Kushner, who mined the same territory). Fabric, is, in fact, the most common motif in "Women's Work." Doris Nogueria-Rogers' elegant collages suggest food with sharp symmetrical but organic shapes and patterned cloth-like surfaces. Nannette Acker Clark has based a lot of her work on fabric, especially printed African fabric. Her paintings from the "Cut to the Chase" series are dynamic abstractions in strong color, gray with red or green with ochre. Sharply delineated curves and angles resemble clothing pattern or quilt pieces. Painted lines of oversize "stitching" reinforce that reference.


(CLICK IMAGE FOR LARGER VERSION)

Martina Johnson-Allen's nine small "Sacred Space" shadow boxes from about five years ago present yet another way of representing cloth. Ornamented with collage elements including buttons, the constructed framing elements dominate pointed cut-paper shapes jutting up inside them. Almost every surface is hot sunflower yellow, heavily embellished with multicolored lines and dots resembling both embroidery and lace.

The two sculptors in the show could hardly be more different. Sica's small freestanding pieces are composed of flat planes of metal, some polished, some patinated, all reflective of African sculpture. Kathleen Spicer's wall-mounted work is carved, polychrome wood, lush with undulating images of flowers, fruits and plants.

A lingering question relating to the "Women's Work" title is: Would or should a parallel show of men's art be called "Men's Work"? When I put it to Philadelphia curator and writer A.M. Weaver, she replied that such a gesture would be pointless because shows exclusively devoted to men are the norm. "Given the current art-market climate, women still need greater representation," she said. "Men are again starting to dominate the fine-arts arena."

(r_rice@citypaper.net)

Women's Work | Through May 1, Sande Webster Gallery, 2006 Walnut St., 215-636-9003, sandewebstergallery.com

Comments

Oh Robin, u and shitypaper are really trying hard to getz some controversy going here and generate some badly needed hitz. Is this "Special Web Content" thang mean this article isn't in the paper rag!!!!!???

Women have for a very long time and still du dominate the fillytowne scene, duh. To du a women's only show does nothing butt divid the artz community. A.M. Teaser is known for dat already. What a f'n joke yous ladies are. "The" museum was run by women for forever. The ICA still is. Most all the gallery directors are women including Ms. Webster at the gallery in question. All the critics are and have been women except for Mr. Ed.

And using sex buzz wordz like vagina will help the pervz looking for porn find yous even easier, generate some hitz, and maybe they will buy an ad after they read this piece-o-crap.

This whole thing is soooooooooo 70's it is laughable, like the entire crew at shitypaper who once again have earned their name. Wee would feel sorry for the women artists who agreed to bee part of this gang and bee in a show like this, butt they deserve the scorn and lack of respect they get from ompeting as artits and not artists. Tick, Tisk.

Robin tries in such an obvious way to veil her feelingz on this subject. Har! Har! Du u think everyone is stupid or maybe u don't even realize how lame u r.

lovvvvvvvvvveeeeeeeeeeee ya!!!!!!!!!!!
by Harry and Harrietta on April 22nd 2010 9:23 AM

I wish I could see this show. (I live in CT). The pictures accompanying this article have a lightness to them, maybe it is the colors, the lack of density and heaviness to the art. I enjoyed seeming them and I can feel something of a womanliness to them. Nice review!

How did the above letter writers come to read this article? Their self-conscious style negates any opinions they share.
by helena on April 22nd 2010 7:57 PM

This was an excellent exhibition! I particularly loved Oh's work and Spicer's sculptures. I think in this review you managed to captured the underlying theme...it is 'Women's Work' in a man's world.
by M.M. Perez on April 22nd 2010 11:34 PM

Women's Work at the Sande Webster Gallery in no way divides the art community; As you can see from these comments it sparks a conversation about a very politically charged topic. The exhibition raises an important question about gender and identity in contemporary arts. Specifically it addresses how gender can influence the ways in which we interpret works of art. I believe that the show exposes how everyone has pre-conceived ideas about what a feminine-perspective on art might look like. The topic of gender and identity is not something that simply happened in the 70's and is no longer valid. Holding on to our identities in the digital age is more important than ever. I really wish this was a passe topic, and that we had culturally evolved beyond sexism and racism. What would the proposed alternative of a faceless, sexless, identity-less art world really look like? Our individual stories, heritage and life experiences need to be celebrated not hidden.
by Anonymous on April 23rd 2010 12:13 AM

Look, letz bee real. The curator said this show was organized because the "men" were starting to dominate the scene "again". Here is the truth.

If u want to know who is keeping anybody down, including women, follow the money trail, DUHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! U should know this by now AM and Robin, so u are either dumb or think wee are dumb and we will believe your thesis. But u can't blame the real culprits cause it doesn't sound right and the men are an easier target. Although wee don't know why u think u will garner the support of your male husband, father, brother, teacher, professor, neighbor, male artist etc.

The new chairWOMAN at the PMA is a perfect example. Did she become chair over you AM because she is a man, oh thatz right, she's a she. And she is an oil heiress and former senator, duh.

Here are some other thangz to think about:
is it the monied holdin u down or men?
Is it ageism or is it the men?
Is it cause u are minorities or the men?
Is it needlework craft or art, or the men?
Is it the art itself or the men?
Is it the lack of artz support in general or the men?

When u have a show like this u are saying these women need special treatment cause they been held down. Did Alice who came to the USA as a foreigner and who graduated from Yale and won a Peeeewwww and teaches at UPENN the downtrotten???? plleeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!

U R dividing the community and wee say to the men and everyone else- do not go to these showz, do not give them money, do not become memberz, do not buy their work. Wee are all artists regardless, and u are just another gang, and a militant one trying to prop one group up while pushing down another.

Peace out yo! lovvvvvvvvveeeeeeeeeeeee ya!!!!! H+H
by Harry and Harrietta on April 23rd 2010 7:51 AM

It is ridiculous to construe that by celebrating Women, one is condemning Men. The fact is that being pro-woman doesn't mean you hate men. H & H you are the hater! If you really had read Robin's review you would see that AM was not the curator, she was just quoted in the article as to her point of view.
by Peace! on April 23rd 2010 11:56 AM

Thankz for pointing out that AM, a woman, and curator well regarded in the area, was not the curator of this particular show. It is hard for us to read bad writing and wee kind of speed read through a lot of it with no apologies.

Letz celebrate men den, and doggies, and Lithowanians, and space men, and prisoners (oh yeah, shitypaper already does dat). PPPPleeeezzzzzz!!!!!!!

U have no argument. It is wrong. Robin picked this story to write about, after it closed btw, because it gave her a platform for her own politics and an excuse to write about a gallery she usually never touches. The director and frenz put all the women in one basket so she could stave off the women critics that her gallery shows mostly men of a certain race. Doesn't anyone speak the truth?????

Du you think wee will buy this "celebrating women" cliche and everything will be othay? There is no reason to celebrate women because women's art is the same as men's. To say otherwise in another context would be an outrage to feminists and u know it. When sen on a cv this appears as a joke, holdz no importance to anyone but other militant feminists.

When any group getz a show, other artists do not get a show, or a review, or a sale, or recognition, or, or... This is not an innocent thang and using sweet wordz and acting like victims will not change that.

lovvvvvvvvvvveeeeeeeeeeeee ya!!!!!!!!!!!! H_H
by Harry and Harrietta on April 23rd 2010 12:26 PM

H&H = Internet troll. Ignore.
by Whatever on April 23rd 2010 1:39 PM

Gender and Identity in art is a valid topic to discuss, celebrate, hate, love and every other emotion. Our identities don't just disappear in an "equal" society. Obviously we need more exhibitions and discussion on this topic because there is so much unsubstantiated prejudices towards members of other genders and races. "Doesn't anyone speak the truth?" Well, the truth is that sexism and racism is obviously still very much present in 2010.
by Truth Speaker on April 23rd 2010 2:29 PM

Sexism is alive and well in the fillytowne artworld dominated by women, giving themselves women's shows and excluding men, Truth Speaker. Going a little broad on the topic maybe to make a point that doesn't wash here, u know locally where these shows are taking place, duh???

Others have written in and said this wasn't about sexism, make your mindz up. And now this show is about race too?

There have been numerous women only shows this year in fillytowne, more than one are on rightch now. The question is "Do woman artist in fillytowne need to have shows that exclude men"? Answer NO. If you think they should then state why. Simple. sí??

There have also been a number of citywide Takeoverfest that favored women like Fiber and Ceramics. Add all this up and what do you have? A conscience move towards marginalizing a large sector of the arts community. Did wee mention that all the Art Centers are women run and manned for the most part too by the fairer, hah, sex.

Wee think this is a losing strategy for women and these orgs. Men may be dogs butt they ain't stupid. And these shows look bad for the women who stock them.

lovvvveeeeeeee ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! H+H
by Harry and Harrietta on April 23rd 2010 6:36 PM

H+H, you make so many factual errors, it's ridiculous. If you are going to attack a piece of writing, it is advisable to read it first.
- The show was curated by three men not a woman
- Ms. Rice has reviewed Sande Webster many times over the years.
- The show is not over but up until May 1 (Don't miss it folks)
- BTW, The PMA's primary leader is a man
by shame on you on April 23rd 2010 7:06 PM

U all try to avoid the real issue here. It's called pivoting and has other namez, a tool used by politicans to avoid the substance of an issue. The article isn't worth a read, it is so formulaic it's not funny. Wee are talking about the need, or not, of Women only showz. Does it matter that this one using thread and that one paint? Not to us. Our eyez do a better job than these lame-o descriptions.

Here are links we found using the shitty shitypaper's serach engine to articles Robin Rice wrote on SWG. Du u call this a lot? If it's less than once a year, is that a lot?

2006
2002 Another Woman's show
1996

show closes April 26, is that 3 days they will be open? From their web site with an asterisk that leadz to no where??????????????

Womens Work
A Group Show
April 9 - April 26, 2010
RECEPTION: Friday, April 9th, 6-8 pm
* Work will be on view through May *
?????????????????????????????????????

So what men curated it? Does that change the fact that all women artists are IN the exhibition?

U diminish the role of the Chair at PMA as if it's not a leading role? Mr. Lenfest might object. And what about Anne d' who just passed? Jeeezzzzz!!!!!!!!!!! Who needz to get factz straight? Women have now and have had in the past leading rolez of importance at the PMA.

U are a bore and are avoiding the real problem. WE DO NOT NEED SHOWZ FOR WOMEN ONLY! If we du tell us why?????

by Harry and Harrietta on April 23rd 2010 8:01 PM

Because before 1986, all editions of H.W. Janson's History of Art (the standard text used in introductory college art history classes), included 3,000 male and no female artists. In the latest version, published in 1991, only 19 women are represented
by Reality Check on April 23rd 2010 9:48 PM

this is fillytowne yo. what a bunch of dodgers yous all r! and y, cause you got no case at all. zero cred Reality Checkoff.
by Harry and Harrietta on April 23rd 2010 10:01 PM

I can not agree with Harry and Harrietta at all. I like going to All Girl Shows because there's no male competition and I have a better chance of getting lucky. And since most of the places I hope to exhibit my work in one day are run by women, I want to do everything I can to ingratiate myself to the fairer sex. Females rule!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Shaun Baer on April 24th 2010 5:56 PM

@Reality Check

To fully understand Harry and Harrietta, you really need to go here:

http://theartblahg.blogspot.com
by Just Helpin’ out on May 12th 2010 9:50 AM

Why do you allow Vincent Romaniello, who has written here under Harry and Harrietta (and falsely written here under "Shaun Baer") to continue to post trolling comments "anonymously?" It degrades your site and your paper.

Vincent Romaniello is an internet troll who writes artblahg and a "real" blog, romanblog2. He has attacked many Philadelphia artists and is facing pending legal action due to his cyber harassment. Most of the things Vince writes are opinion but he has threatened physical stalking and violence, which is a crime.

If you have been impersonated by or feel threatened by Vincent Romaniello, please contact the Philadelphia Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts. They have a great deal of information on him and can help you. They can also help you to determine what is opinion, versus liable and harassment.


http://www.artsandbusinessphila.org/pvla/

or at 215 790 3620
by Anon on May 28th 2011 4:01 PM



Also In This Week's Arts Section

Kaleidoscope
Theater Review:
Bum's Rush
by David Anthony Fox

Dance:
Out of Step
by Deni Kasrel

Theater Review:
Let's Play Two
by Mark Cofta

 
 
ADVERTISEMENT