Vote for Joe Sestak

It's time for Arlen Specter to go.

Published: May 13, 2010

We sympathize with Arlen Specter. After 30 years of faithful service — of backing President Bush's Iraq war, of campaigning for Sarah Palin, of supporting Steve Forbes' flat tax, of going to the mat for Clarence Thomas — his increasingly right-wing Republican Party didn't want him anymore. Especially given that it was Specter's support for the stimulus bill that sealed his fate within the GOP. Since his conversion a year ago, Specter has been a good soldier for his new Democratic Party: defending his stimulus vote, advocating vigorously for the health care bill, pushing for gay rights. He's courted the party's progressive base well.

ADVERTISEMENT

But it's not enough to earn our endorsement. Put simply, Specter's willingness to change his stripes so brazenly for the sake of his own political survival does not inspire a lot of faith in what he'd do after the primary. And Specter has proven himself all too willing to roll in the mud with his attacks on opponent Joe Sestak's Navy record. (Indeed, if the worst that Specter can come up with is that Sestak rode his subordinates too hard, we can live with that.)

We're not entirely smitten with Sestak. The retired Navy admiral certainly has the credentials and smarts — three decades in the uniform, master's and doctorate degrees from Harvard — to do the job, but we've been less than enthused with his campaign, which has, until the last few weeks, seemed a bit listless. His melodramatic intonation and speechifying is annoying, but in the grand scheme of things, a forgivable offense.

Sestak is the better Democrat. For the last four years, he's been a solid progressive voice in Congress, and his military and intelligence experience would serve the Senate well. He deserves your support on Tuesday.

(editorial@citypaper.net)

Comments

I'm voting for Sestak anyways, but your cover turned me off.

Maybe I'm thin-skinned about animals, and I know you don't actually advocate harming animals, but given the recent incidents in this city of the torture of cats through the use of duct tape or by burning, your cover is a little out of line.

Thanks for supporting Sestak, but Philadelphia's cats have been through enough already to be the target of yet another lame ripoff of an old Harvard Lampoon cover.
by Dave on May 13th 2010 3:38 PM

I am voting for Joe Sestak too, and my little cat Rita, who understands imagery and can read newspapers, was also very upset with your cover. She just told me that if she had voting rights, that she would switch parties and vote for Toomey.
by Carl on May 13th 2010 4:42 PM

Feeling the Joementum.
by Lady Lunchtray on May 13th 2010 5:41 PM

Um...you people do realize that the cat photo is an homage to the famous "Buy this magazine or we'll shoot this dog" National Lampoon cover, right?
by Rodney Anonymous on May 13th 2010 6:07 PM

Specter's time is up! Vote for Joe. D
by Claudia on May 13th 2010 6:15 PM

Not only is the image an homage to the NL cover, there's no way that could have been a real gun. It's not possible that anyone associated with City Paper owns a gun, much less has the courage to actually pick one up.

I'm always currious when liberals say the Republican Party has moved to the right.
I don't remember Scoop Jackson and Zell Miller trying to manage ever aspect of my life.
by Tannhauser on May 14th 2010 9:31 AM



Also In This Week's Cover Story Section

VOTE!
Vote for Dan Onorato
Maybe, Why Not?, Oh God Yes, Sure
Vote for Manan Trivedi
The Rep Schlep
by Isaiah Thompson

Run, Ladies, Run
by Holly Otterbein

Money Talking
by Holly Otterbein and Isaiah Thompson

The Also-Rans
by Jeffrey C. Billman

 
 
ADVERTISEMENT