ARTS . Theater

Flourish or Perish

Temple Repertory Theater takes a risk while everyone else is on vacation.

Published: Jul 7, 2010

[ theater ]

In an economic and cultural climate where starting a serious professional summer theater in Philadelphia is a huge gamble — we're known for physically and mentally living "downa Shore" in July and August, and even the venerable Pennsylvania Shakespeare Festival anchors its season with a crowd-pleasing musical — the face-value risk that Dan Kern takes in launching Temple Repertory Theater's rotating productions of Chekhov's Three Sisters and Shakespeare's Measure for Measure
seems huge.

But he has his reasons.

"It's a two-part thing," says Kern, the company's artistic director and winner of a Barrymore for Best Direction of a Play for Lantern Theater Co.'s production of Skylight. "First, we have a very talented and committed faculty active in the local theater scene, and we share a sensibility about what an ensemble can be."

The word "ensemble" implies a group of artists working together over time, "not living under the pressure of having to find their next job," Kern explains, "who know each other, and are allowed to take risks, a fertile creative environment." Both Kern and Temple Theaters' artistic director, Douglas Wager, matured in regional theaters that stressed collaborative community.

Second, Temple's unique Masters of Fine Arts acting program recruits mid-career professionals seeking an advanced degree. To speed their progress, the degree takes two years, including summers — which the theater department would normally take off.

"We melded this with the practical, of course," Kern continues. "We received a mandate from the university to get better, to 'flourish or perish.' A lot of M.F.A. programs have connections with a resident professional company," so Temple's gone and created its own. This troupe features Barrymore winner Genevieve Perrier (Skylight) and Broadway veterans Yvette Ganier (The Miracle Worker, King Hedley II) and Gregg Almquist (I'm Not Rappaport, Richard III).

So why start with the classics — plays many might consider too heavy for summertime?

"Well, we hope patrons of larger theaters will come," Kern says. "We hope there's a critical mass of people who will be interested. This is a smart town, a sophisticated theater town." Moreover, he says, more confidently, "with the talent we have here, it doesn't make sense not to capitalize on our strengths," which include Temple graduates Dirk Durossette (scenic design), Millie Hiibel (costumes), John Hoey (lighting) and David O'Connor (sound).

Kern and Wager are determined to give those audiences something special. TRT places play and audience together on the Tomlinson Theater's vast stage, with only 150 seats. "Doing theater in L.A.," says Kern — who worked for the American Conservatory Theater, Mark Taper Forum and South Coast Rep — "I saw that a great piece of writing in an intimate space has a powerful effect."

Three Sisters (which Kern directs) and Measure for Measure (which Wager directs, with Kern playing the Duke) are ideal for the emotionally genuine acting that Kern teaches. "A play like Three Sisters really flourishes when actors are available and open," says Kern. "It's full of disconnects and surprises, and jumps from joy, hilarity and tears of laughter to tears of sorrow." Themes relevant to modern Americans, he says, "blossom out of moment-to-moment life." Shakespeare's provocative Measure for Measure receives a modernist spin from Wager, former artistic director of Arena Stage in Washington, D.C.

The season came together last fall, when Kern realized that the year's class work in Shakespeare and Chekhov would be more meaningful with a real-world focus. Future seasons will depend on what suits the talent. "We're not a Shakespeare festival," Kern says. "We'll reach in any direction."

(m_cofta@citypaper.net)

Three Sisters, through Aug. 1; Measure for Measure, through July 30; $15-$25, Temple University, 1301 W. Norris St., 800-838-3006, temple.edu/theater.

Comments

ZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Sounds like dull and duller do two plays.
by Timmy on July 9th 2010 7:08 PM

Seriously, this is how my night was: Go to North Philadelphia, see college theater, fall asleep, wake up to applause, question what I did to deserve a fate worse than death, never think about that experience again and move on.
by devour on July 10th 2010 12:23 AM

Timmy, were you the guy in the side section tonight who moved from seat to seat, reclined across several at one point, left the theater for a good portion of Act I, and then left at intermission?
Funny, you decided "ZZZZZZZ" before the show, then went to it anyway? Sounds like a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you know you aren't going to like a play, why go? Those of us applauding had a very different experience; maybe we expected something more than "dull and duller."
by Mark Cofta on July 10th 2010 12:42 AM

Oh, sorry, I thought Timmy and "devour" were the same person -- their comments are equally witty! So, "devour," were YOU the squirmy guy? My understated point is still valid: you have to make an effort at the theatre to appreciate it. Both of you need to stick to television, which makes no such demands.
by Mark Cofta on July 10th 2010 12:50 AM

You don't get it do you. The play was a painful experience. I have attended plays at many theater's in the Phila region, Lantern, Arden, Azuka, even at the dreaded Walnut St studio 5. I know what is good and enjoyable theater. While you make an effort to like a play, I will like a play. Temple Rep should die a quick boring death, just like the death I experienced inside while I watched that horrific show.
by devour on July 10th 2010 7:15 AM

To Marc and Devour - I wasn't there, and won't go. I experienced mostly stultifying, soul-sucking theater on Main Campus as a Temple transfer student. This summer's heat and humidity had nothing to do with my initial comment and my decision to stay away. I also disagree that you have to make an effort to 'like' a play. You don't have to 'like' a play to have a great experience in the theater. For instance, I did not 'like' Martin McDonagh's "The Pillowman" and others of its kind.
And I didn't have to make an attempt to like it, either. I went in neutral, ready for the evening to succeed or fail on its own merits. Good theater doesn't need an audience to be predisposed in one way or another. And by the way, I didn't see that one on television. I saw it in London, along with many other fine plays.
by Timmy on July 10th 2010 10:09 AM

What I meant, Timmy, is that we need to go to the theatre open to what a play offers. You're right not to go to Temple if you're so certain it will be a bad experience -- thinking that ahead of time will make it so.
I don't think "neutral" really exists, though -- you made some sort of decision to attend the play and have some sort of expectation, so you can't really "go in neutral." Moreover, no play "succeeds or fails on its own merits"; it all depends on the audience's reaction. An audience full of Negative Nellies like "Devour" will make any play terrible, but an audience more open to the possibilities, willing at least to give a play a chance (which I suspect is what you mean by "neutral"), can really make a play great. I've seen enough theatre here and in London to know this very well. The audience that woke Devour up last night with applause were open to the possibility that a century-old story of lost Russian souls could matter to them, and they were not disappointed.
by Mark Cofta on July 11th 2010 12:14 AM

I saw Measure for Measure on Saturday night at Temple. Excellent acting, very entertaining. And I'm not a Shakespeare fan.
by etjel on July 12th 2010 11:35 AM

I really enjoyed it, too! The script is perplexing, which is part of what makes it so intriguing after 400 years, and the production brings it into our time with a suggestion of Taliban-ish repression that's both exciting and frightening.
by Mark Cofta on July 12th 2010 12:16 PM

I saw The Three Sisters and liked it so much that I went back to see Measure for Measure which was also terrific. I took a class from Drexel to see the Chekhov and the reaction of most students was enthusiastically positive. The play is complex and difficult, but the production makes it accessible and meaningful. I was going to say "delightful," but that's only to those who take delight in being moved from the same-old same old.
by Eva Thury on July 18th 2010 11:59 AM



Also In This Week's Arts Section

Shelf Life:
Small Wonders
by Justin Bauer

Kaleidoscope
Dance:
Koresh Artist Showcase
by Jen Rini

 
 
ADVERTISEMENT